Aligning muon alignment code - #51083
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51083/49547
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @kandrosov for master. It involves the following packages:
@Alejandro1400, @JanChyczynski, @Moanwar, @arunhep, @atpathak, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @perrotta, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
please test |
@kandrosov please provide evidence for it, in particular about what do you mean by "compatible". Did you present the comparison somewhere (e.g. Muon or Tracking POG, CondPrep meetings)? |
|
-1 Failed Tests: HeaderConsistency UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT AddOn Failed Unit TestsI found 2 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test_MC_23_crosscheck had ERRORS ---> test test_MC_22_crosscheck had ERRORS Failed RelValsExpand to see more relval errors ...
Failed RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
Failed AddOn TestsExpand to see more addon errors ... |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51083/49559
|
|
Pull request #51083 was updated. @Alejandro1400, @JanChyczynski, @Moanwar, @arunhep, @atpathak, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @perrotta, @rseidita, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
|
@cmsbuild please test |
Hi @kandrosov @acagnotta are there news about the planned presentation of this updated code and its results, in a CondPrep meeting? |
Hi @perrotta, sorry for the late reply. I scheduled a contribution at Conditions Preparations meeting for today, unfortunately the meeting will be only virtual. Link to the presentation, let us know if you have any questions. |
|
@acagnotta @kandrosov thank you for the link to the "virtual" presentation at the CondPrep meeting of July 13. This is enough for me to eventually sign this PR for AlCa. Before doiing so, could you please consider the few small improvements suggested here above? And possibly also squash all commits into a single one, for easier future tracking of the modifications applied to the code? |
- Adapted code to be compatible with the latest CMSSW version - Implemented review comments
473cacd to
57c6986
Compare
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51083/50502
|
|
Pull request #51083 was updated. @Alejandro1400, @EltonSh, @JanChyczynski, @Moanwar, @arunhep, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @perrotta, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
|
please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Failed Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+alca
|
|
@cmsbuild, please test
|
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Failed Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testAlignmentStats had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@cmsbuild, please test
|
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
PR description:
The muon alignment code was diverged from the central CMSSW. In fact, all muon alignments for Run 3 were produced using private forks. The goal of this PR is to rebase modifications made over the past few years onto the current CMSSW. In this PR, we would like to keep the code as close as possible to what was used for Run 3 alignments to provide a reference point. Once it is merged, we plan to refactor/modernize the code and introduce new developments for Phase 2.
PR validation:
Alignment results obtained with the "usual Run 3 alignment code" and this merged version of the code are compatible.
FYI @acagnotta